add comment

If you are commenting on a logo, please focus on concrete suggestions for improving the logo. Cheers or jeers won't get published.

Name (required)
Email (required, will not be published)
Website

Enter code (required): 3810

comments

This is my logo I designed and after looking at it this small size, I think it might look better if the .com was taken off or resized. That can easily be done if anyone wants me to do that.
(Andrew Kidd at 2005/09/16 16:10:35.171 GMT-5)

.com is hard to read which you've stated. Might be read as Blow Gads as mentioned in the manifesto. Nice touch with the overlapping letters and great up and down arrangment. I think it fits their former style but maybe a little to much.
(Curtis D. Tucker at 2005/09/17 11:17:05.318 GMT-5)

Just curious, how could it be read as Blow Gads if there is no W in my logo?
(andrew Kidd at 2005/09/20 16:23:30.400 GMT-5)

Hey Andrew, If you reread the manifesto you will see this as one of their "pointers": while we like "blogads," some journalists seem to like writing "BlogAds." And neophytes sometimes pronounce blogads as "Blow-Gads." So, I'm biased to BlogAds. That's where I came up with my comment.
(Curtis D. Tucker at 2005/09/21 07:44:41.083 GMT-5)