add comment

If you are commenting on a logo, please focus on concrete suggestions for improving the logo. Cheers or jeers won't get published.

Name (required)
Email (required, will not be published)
Website

Enter code (required): 5274

comments

Very cool logo.
(andrew Kidd at 2005/09/10 01:59:50.568 GMT-5)

Real Refreshing! This has to be it.
(enginerd at 2005/09/11 01:38:36.327 GMT-5)

Nice typography from a design standpoint, but it's really difficult to make out blagads
(john at 2005/09/12 09:30:31.680 GMT-5)

I am cooler than you.
(Landslide at 2005/09/14 13:31:42.468 GMT-5)

Agree with John. It's over-funky. WE all know we're looking for "Blogads" but let's not make it hard on the other folks.
(Brian at 2005/09/15 19:49:17.882 GMT-5)

Nice color, but VERY difficult to make out.
(Patricia at 2005/09/16 21:22:51.653 GMT-5)

A very nice design! Not sure if it fits the image they were searching for. Could be bolder. Could be read as Blow Gads as stated in the manifesto.
(Curtis D. Tucker at 2005/09/17 16:01:05.487 GMT-5)

An interesting concept, and especially from a graphic point of view. However, if someone who was not visually oriented was just making their way to your site for the first time, it might be difficult to make out the words.
(Heidi Frieder at 2005/09/19 01:08:50.098 GMT-5)

Very nice look. I think with some tweaking it could be made more legible. (Instead of cutting the pieces away completely, replace them with a lighter shade perhaps.) My main gripe is with the "disintegration" metaphor. I think you would have a hard time explaining this look and how it fits in with the blogads philosophy. Using a stock font is also a minus in my opinion. As a logo, this is not bad. As a logo for blogads I think it falls far from the mark.
(Ken Lonseth at 2005/09/19 20:21:10.444 GMT-5)